loader image
Loading...
Skip to content
Home » News » Short Path vs. Wiped Film Distillation: Which One is Best for Cannabis Extracts?

Short Path vs. Wiped Film Distillation: Which One is Best for Cannabis Extracts?

  • by

When refining cannabis extracts into high-purity distillates, two primary methods stand out: Short Path Distillation and Wiped Film Distillation. Both techniques efficiently remove impurities, but they serve different needs.

Short Path Distillation

 How It Works:

Uses a vacuum-assisted, heated flask to separate cannabinoids from unwanted compounds based on boiling points.

Ideal for small-batch, high-purity THC or CBD distillates.

✅ Pros:

Great for small-scale labs

Produces high-potency distillate

Cost-effective for startups

❌ Cons:

Slower process than wiped film

Requires multiple passes for ultra-pure results

Wiped Film Distillation

 How It Works:

Utilizes a continuous feed system with a rotating wiper blade, spreading the extract into a thin film on a heated surface.

Great for high-volume production while maintaining purity.

✅ Pros:

Faster processing for large-scale operations

Less thermal degradation (better for preserving minor cannabinoids)

Ideal for bulk distillate production

❌ Cons:

Higher initial cost for equipment

Requires more technical expertise

Which One Should You Choose?

For small-batch, boutique distillates → Short Path

For large-scale, high-efficiency production → Wiped Film

Both methods yield high-potency cannabis distillates, but your choice depends on scale, efficiency, and budget.

 Which distillation method do you prefer? Let’s discuss in the comments!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Chat